EDUARDO TERRAZAS

 
 
 
Eduardo Terrazas
Languages for Navigating Structures
09.06.22 - 12.08.22
We are pleased to present Eduardo Terrazas' 5th solo exhibition at NILS STÆRK. 

Languages for Navigating Structures - Wood, Wax and Yarn
 
Art manifests the desire to make tangible the organization of objects in the world within a coherent space, structured according to geometric laws.
— Philippe Descola


Just about all of us are kept busy translating what we are privileged to witness¬—life, its setting and its dramas, its joys and its ups and downs—into images visible, exchangeable and maybe mental, even if the latter are obviously trickier to share.
The artist makes a profession out of this, and representing what is beyond our scale, both spatial and temporal, stimulates his imagination and guides his hand, from cave paintings to the present day. In the case of Eduardo Terrazas it is neither more nor less than the entire universe that the artist takes on the task of containing and synthesizing in abstract geometric constructions. In a systematic, apparently limitless combinatorial game, he explores the possibilities offered by compasses, rulers, pencils, paper, acrylic paint and—wool!

Ahead of its time in many respects, his work heralds a number of research projects since carried out by younger artists. It must be said that Terrazas has been running around the world for a long time, well before artistic nomadism became a religion. He also realized early on the creative potential of the Mexican street. Inspired by what he saw and assimilated from the artistic movements of his formative years, his work was already part of what the 1960s were fomenting. If the influences of concrete art and Latin American op art are evident, he did not remain deaf to the provocative seductions of mid-sixties psychedelia, or at least adopted some of its chromatic consequences. Trained as an architect, Terrazas developed a prolific body of work by adopting, among other things, a technique invented by the Huichol, the Amerindian group whose main community lives in San Andrés Cohamiata, a village perched on a red earth plateau in the heart of the Sierra Madre Occidental. The technique in question consists in fixing colored wool onto wooden panels coated with Campeche wax, which acts as an adhesive. The thread snakes along reproducing the lines, curves, meanders and changes of direction that the chosen motif requires, covering the waxed surface in a tirelessly repeated back and forth movement during which each strand is glued tightly along the previous one without leaving any gaps or openings between them. While the Huichol use this process to represent their cosmogony and the sacred entities that animate it, Terrazas requisitions wood, wax and wool to map the universe. Although the forms are distinct—the former resolutely figurative, the latter abstract—the goal in both cases is the same: to reveal and share a colorfully singular pictorial version of their respective world views.
 
Under the generic title of Possibilities of a Structure, maverick structuralist Terrazas bends wool to the whims of curves interspersed with verticals and horizontals, of medians that cleave circles and squares, or stop short to let rhombuses, triangles and other eccentric geometric shapes unfold freely within squares rarely exceeding 120 centimeters on a side. The original structure, perfectly symmetrical, serves as a matrix for hundreds of variations that Terrazas describes as cosmic. A generous, fantastic range of colors fuels and enriches the exercise by enabling the emergence of polychrome asymmetries offering infinite cadastral solutions.
 
These Possibilities of a Structure recently experienced a kind of epiphany when Hans Ulrich Obrist, who needs no introduction, brought together Eduardo Terrazas and Marcus du Sautoy. The encounters between artist and mathematician gave rise to moments of collaborative creativity during which du Sautoy explicitly recognized and named each area of the original structure at the center of which he situates the earth: while the celestial dome occupies the periphery, four essential forces respectively qualified as gravitational, electromagnetic, strong nuclear and weak nuclear, compete for the space in between.
 
For this exhibition the artist, armed with this precise, informed interpretation of his structure, has taken some liberties, notably abandoning the square in order to invent new cosmic variations set this time in less usual geometric figures such as the triangle, octagon and dodecagon. Certain compositions claiming to be from the Cosmos series, together with a group of four serigraphs linked to the original structure, accompany these innovations. The overall geometric organization, which remains faithful to the square, produces optical effects similar to those obtained with a kaleidoscope. Reflections and chromatic recurrences transform these arrangements into targets whose dominant concentric circles are fragmented by abrupt changes of color.
 
I have mentioned elsewhere the desire for a third dimension one senses in certain two-dimensional works whose motifs strain and jostle the surface. One thinks of the early paintings of the heroine of the Brazilian neo-concrete, the marvelous Lygia Clark. What Terrazas achieves through the construction contained in this single dodecagon is exceptional and of the same order. The reversals and interplay of clashing perspectives that develop within it give one the impression of being confronted with an unknown rock crystal, a new enigma of the upside down in which the intertwining of volumes defies understanding, leaving one perplexed and delighted.
 
A coincidental coming together of calendars sees this text born in a place where we probe the famous cosmos to which Terrazas dedicates his time, his ideas and most of his creative work: according to the experts, the Astronomical Observatory of the UNAM (National Autonomous University of Mexico), located in San Pedro Martir in Baja California, is today, after Hawaii and the Canary Islands, the best place on earth from which to scrutinize the universe.
 
— Michel Blancsubé
Baja California, May 2022
English translation: John Tittensor

 

Darío Escobar

Darío Escobar
Encrypted Messages
01.04.22 - 28.05.22

We are pleased to present Darío Escobar's 3rd solo exhibition at NILS STÆRK.

Encrypted Messages investigates the counterbalance between signs of consumerism and religion in modern history.

The exhibition features two series of works based on found objects. Juxtaposing societal polar opposites, the artist will fill the gallery space with signs collected from roads in eastern Guatemala and southern Mexico, alongside clusters of various paraphernalia from the world of sport. By altering each object, using the historical Baroque technique of applying gold leaf to the surface of an object, the artist reveals the many similarities between sport and religion, both in Latin America and throughout the world. Athletes have become role models for young people, representing as they do a dream of upward mobility. In their eyes, the objects used in sport assume the significance of sacred relics.

As a form of intimidation or by way of pastime, gunshots have perforated the street signs. Initially, the bullet holes come across as representations of violence. However, Escobar seeks to rethink the message of the found object, regarding the perforations as encoded messages – signs that we cannot read, but only approach more tangibly. While these bullet holes may represent the threats of everyday life, Escobar challenges our understanding of the statements with his application of a golden surface. The artist adds a reflective side to the object, thereby overwriting its original message. The language of the objects also shifts from reading to understanding. In this simple, yet powerful gesture, he transforms the holes into more abstract emblems, compelling his audience to view the world in a different light.

_

Golden Ageing

In Hippias Major, one of Plato's famed dialogues, Socrates asks Hippias what beauty is for him: a beautiful woman, gold whose overlay makes everything beautiful, wealth and respect, burying one's parents and being buried by one's children, are the criteria proposed by Hippias. Socrates refutes this definition. In his opinion, what is beautiful is what is appropriate and useful, without excluding the pleasures of seeing and hearing.
Beauty is not really up for debate in the artistic field today, but Dario Escobar nonetheless adopts Hippias' assertion that gold would make people love any form it covers. Like the art world in general, though, the Guatemalan artist sidesteps any hypothetical issue of good and bad taste as he sets about applying gold leaf to specific parts of meticulously chosen secondhand objects.

These objects, some of them enhanced with a precious metal considered incorruptible and exceptionally malleable, are those of industrially manufactured items that Escobar has been working on and modifying for almost twenty-five years. Most come from the world of leisure: balls of all kinds, bats, rackets, skateboards, surfboards, and billiard cues are reshaped and converted into sculptures. The application of gold to these bats and balls effectively turns them into trophies given a second lease of life via a romantic urge to retain and preserve things usually discarded once deteriorated or obsolete. Gold functions here as a barrier to oblivion and the programmed elimination of items that have had their day and which the market hastens to replace with others, brand new and often identical. A priori stainless, gold stops time and its inexorable entropic march. Transformed by this gilt addition, Escobar's artefacts are frozen in hieratic immobility heedless of the heinous crime of ornamentation denounced by Adolf Loos early in the last century. Transcending the visual reassurance of a presence prolonged by this golden aggregation, the preciously timeless undecidability of the meaning of these works remains intact.

The resort to precious materials, particularly gold leaf, in recent years by quite a number of living artists makes us stop and think. We all remember the golden calf worshipped by the people of Israel freshly escaped from Egypt in Cecil B. DeMille's The Ten Commandments (1956). Moses, after having taken great pains to save his people from the yoke of Pharaoh, sets off to receive from the Almighty the famous tablets of the law and their rules for a sinless, piously resigned life. On his return, he finds an orgy in full swing with, at its centre, this priceless sculpture, a trivialized representation of each newly free individual's vision of oblivion: instant possession and gratification. And who cares when possession's the name of the game! We may never actually have left it, but the time of the expensive idol follows its course, hallowing triumphant capital and its faith in the glistening and the costly. Escobar is obviously not the only one to invest his creations with materials considered precious. After years of making art out of waste, since 2006 Mexican artist Gabriel Orozco has been working on Samurai Tree, an extensive series of paintings partly composed of gold leaf. Each of his gleaming trees is given a number and a letter, and this army of samurais is dispatched to conquer the market! One also remembers the never-to-be-outdone Englishman Damien Hirst who, some fifteen years ago, sold a vanitas composed of 6801 diamonds mounted on a platinum skull for 74.4 million euros. The artistic production of the moment is a reflection of its time. An affabulator named Marcel Duchamp declared at the beginning of the sixties, during an interview with Georges Charbonnier, that in his opinion, a work of art had no price. Robert Smithson, running into the same Duchamp in the Cordier-Ekstrom Gallery in New York in 1963, asked him if he practiced alchemy. And the inventor of the readymade admitted that he did. Have times really changed that much? Might the art object have so definitively lost its mana that it now has to requisition the symbols of wealth that are gold, precious stones and other expensive avatars to support the illusion of its power or the power of its illusion? More prosaically, might artists have grown weary of alchemy and collectors leery of so-called popular or even too ordinary materials? A native of a country whose economic system relies largely on recycling, and at the same time well acquainted with the trends and tenets of the art world, Dario Escobar provides obsolete objects with a – homoeopathic – dose of gold, thus saving them from abandonment with a poetic, romantic gesture.             

In recent years Escobar has seized upon a category of objects not rooted in the realm of entertainment. His encrypted messages indiscriminately take over advertising and road signs, as well as simple advertisements for professional services. The rudimentary supports for this miscellany are metal plaques riddled with bullet holes; as a rule, set at visible height along the roads near the points of sale of the promoted products and the stalls where the announced services are dispensed, they are to be seen in urban and rural public spaces everywhere. We still come across a lot of these gregarious advertisements in the most remote corners of the world. Since 2019 Escobar has been collecting these advertising relics, mostly well rusted, in eastern Guatemala and the south of Mexico. Once reclaimed and reworked, they are exposed on the walls of exhibition rooms just as they were, previously, in the great outdoors: a fresh migration from the street to the mausoleum of the kind Latin American artists, among others, are so gifted for. Escobar puts together sets that he hangs in a line, column or cloud. Here a Spanish-language Stop sign "ALTO" ("Halt" but also “High” in English translation) is displayed alone and higher than the others, with half of both its front and back gilded. When the signs are presented in a group, Escobar points them all in the same direction in an orderly parade. Hung like this, they deliver a strange polyphonic message frontally, while the reverse, entirely covered with gold leaf, offers the viewer the vision of a fragmented but flawless three-dimensional gold monochrome. The contrast between the worn, garrulous fronts and their pristine backs is striking: two works in one. The perforations in these signs come in some cases from stray bullets, but just as often from shots deliberately fired to intimidate and hold recalcitrant merchants to ransom. These encrypted messages were inspired by those made in the 1960s by Mathias Goeritz. The golden messages of the German-born artist living in Mexico are also made of perforated metal plates and were themselves inspired by the works of Heinz Mack, founder with Otto Piene of Zero in 1957. Goeritz became aware of Mack's work during a visit to Düsseldorf in the late 1950s.

Dario Escobar sees his work as a reflection on the economic and sociological dynamics that underlie our behavior. Trained as an architect, and a geometry enthusiast into the bargain, he makes the most of a deep knowledge of the art history with which his compositions playfully resonate.

— Michel Blancsubé
Mexico City, March 2022
English translation by John Tittensor

 

PAUL FÄGERSKIÖLD

Paul Fägerskiöld
January 1 2100
 
05.11.21 - 08.01.22
 
It is our pleasure to present Paul Fägerskiöld's first solo exhibition at NILS STÆRK, 'January 1 2100'.

Approximately one year before the first moon landing, Stanley Kubrick’s cinematic landmark 2001: A Space Odyssey was released. It has since been celebrated for its scientifically accurate depiction of space flight and its ambiguous imagery, which remains an open source of philosophical interpretation. In fact, much of the imagined technology and sleek minimal aesthetics presented in Kubrick’s film bear an uncanny resemblance to today’s standard inventory of communication devices. ⁠In the first part of the iconic Blue Danube Waltz scene, the film presents us, for the first time, with an image of what the universe might be like: an infinite, blueish-black against a glowing white, outlining planets seen from shifting perspectives – a complex journey through outer space that seems both abstract and realistic at the same time. ⁠Visually, Kubrick’s scene resembles the paintings in Paul Fägerskiöld’s exhibition January 1, 2100. In addition to the striking similarity of the numerical sequences in both titles, they both present us with possible images of our collective future. ⁠

Paul Fägerskiöld’s paintings remain open, pointing towards the unpredictable. Symbolically speaking, they contemplate the link between the earth, celestial light and life force by the very act of representing physical nature. They resemble a reversed archaeology, as if we are finding something of value just beneath our feet. Like a time capsule, the process may be physical, or something is hidden within layers of memory. Or it may exist in the realm of imagination.

While the compositions appear abstract, without an end or a beginning, the titles are quite accurate locations across the globe. Using the computer software ‘Starry Night’, Fägerskiöld constructs his views of the cosmos. As the exhibition title suggests, the programme calculates views from any location on Earth and nearby galaxies at any date for thousands of years in the past, present and future. Through simple means, the paintings suggest perspectives, making them readable as encapsulated spacescapes. But when we scrutinise them up close, their seemingly uniform surfaces reveal the countless layers of colours underneath. It is, after all, the absence of light that makes the universe appear infinitely dark.


 

                               

We are proud to present a conversation between Paul Fägerskiöld and Kasper Obstrup, researcher and writer specializing in hybrids of art/literature, occultism, and radical points as counter-culture


The Swedish playwright August Strindberg is less known for his intense periods of dedication to painting and photography in the 1890s. In an essay from 1894, ‘Chance in Artistic Creation’, he describes methods he employs, describing his wish to imitate nature’s way of creating. His text later proved to be surprisingly predictive, capturing the automation techniques of the twentieth century. His method involved starting randomly, trusting nature’s inherent desire for form, with the picture finally evolving out of the paint, almost by itself. Like Fägerskiöld’s tactile imagery, Strindberg emphasized the painting surface with such passion that not only does it provide an image of nature, it almost gives the impression of being nature: seascapes or landscapes half-embedded in the material, like a world in the process of being created. In terms of painting, the surface becomes fractural, resembling the texture of the earth. Fägerskiöld does not paint specific nature – his paintings are nature as behaviour. No colour is just one colour. There is always a shadow and nuances. Its materiality and texture are always active, never just monochrome or flat. That is the true nature of painting.

Strindberg’s ‘Celestographs’, with their weathered surfaces, also seem to be in physical alliance with nature. Strindberg’s experiments were quite direct interactions between technology and nature. He would place a photographic plate in the window, exposing it to the starry sky. His photographs actually look like celestial scenes. But you could just as easily see dust or a fragment of soil. The greatness of such imagery, whether in film, photography or painting, lies in offering this double vision, where the starry night and material matter connect and the microcosmos and macro cosmos affect us viscerally. In fact, science today believes that to be true. Stars are formed equally by dust and gas, born in places called nebulae. Over time, due to gravity, and through a process best described as fusion, the nebula collapses to form a nucleus, and that is how, in the midst of a cosmic spark, stars are born. From an unearthly perspective, this also means that we are actually made from stardust.

The term ‘birth’ is often used as a descriptive way of grasping a natural process so immense that it really is ungraspable. Nature has that effect on humans. Conceiving ‘landscape’ painting in the age of the Anthropocene recognises that to be really truthful representation must incorporate our behaviour and language. Rooted in the famous phrase attributed to the Greek philosopher Protagoras from 6th century BC, ‘the measure of all things’ refers to a similar anthropogenic notion of the world. This would later become the Latin phrase ‘homo mensura’ meaning man is the measure of all things, implying that humans use themselves as benchmarks for understanding the world. Fägerskiöld’s paintings of future starry-night skies above us eliminate discussions about true or false. 

We perceive neither a ‘true’ nor a naturalistic imagery from the surfaces of the paintings. Instead, the image spaces open outwards, connecting with the physical space where we, the viewers, are placed. We let go of that specific imagery we try to maintain from the image. Instead, our minds start to wander off into the landscapes of the future: looking southwest in the year 2100 at Lagos, Nigeria, predicted to be the biggest city in the world by then. Or perhaps looking north on 1 January 2100 at Copenhagen. Will we still be here by then? Will our children be here – will they even perceive our world in the same way? Leaving us with such questions, the exhibition space morphs into something else. Like a time machine, the paintings reconnect us with our own position in life. That is what makes them so believable. 

 

 

BETAMAX

BETAMAX

Charlotte Brüel, Rebecca Lindsmyr, Iulia Nistor, Lea Porsager, Sonia Landy Sheridan, Tove Storch and Haegue Yang

04.02.2022 - 26.03.2022

We are pleased to present the group exhibition BETAMAX with works by Charlotte Brüel, Rebecca Lindsmyr, Iulia Nistor, Lea Porsager, Sonia Landy Sheridan, Tove Storch and Haegue Yang. 


BETAMAX

The exhibition title Betamax is a reference to Sony’s 12.7 mm home-video-tape format launched in 1975. The name is derived from the tape’s drive mechanism, which resembles the Greek letter beta. In spite of several superior attributes, including a better-quality picture, it was nevertheless outpaced by the VHS system on the global market. At present, the VHS- and Betamax formats are a thing of the past, for younger generations perhaps just words without body. Words that have disappeared from our language, replaced by new standards for digital representation such as JPEG or NFT. In an etymological sense, the word ’technology’ is made up of téchnë, Greek for arts and craft, and lógos, meaning thought and reason. Technology has since become truly distanced from its original meaning and assumed an almighty and, at times, inhumane character.

“Consciousness constantly creates new things, coloured by what came before and what will be, a constant process, the very phenomenon of creating states of consciousness – that is time. Existing in time, therefore, means being in a state of creation in a heterogeneous, continual stream of ‘has been, is, and will become’.”[1]

The ethos of art is non-linear – like our perception of time. The exhibition presents seven different practices which, collectively, extend across four generations. With their individual experience, they represent different contemporary impressions. Traces intersecting across media. It is a coincidence which, like non-representative painting, is never an upshot of chance but rather a result of stored movements and patterns of perception, operating among several kinds of consciousness.

It is a psychological and physical algorithm used to create, examine, and solve problems during the creational process. Like the camera-based works in the exhibition, it is the actual process behind the picture that brings about the final result. We are presented with manipulative surveillance shots copied from the screen like an analogous screenshot. Works with an inbuilt vacuum of forty years – studies in early digital image experiments which cannot be relegated to a specific time frame, since the works’ creational process spans four decades.

The idea of a room for continuous creative activities is continued in sculptures whose narrative appears open, exact, and unfinished – a network where several spaces come together as one. The exhibition generates a complex network, in which the large installations are shaped by objects subjected to physical cumulative reduction and a redistribution of energy – from colossal vertical connecting links between heaven and earth to openings uniting nature and civilisation. Individually, several works try to unite industrial material and various kinds of arts and craft. Details are not sublime but essential parts of the whole – and, at the same time, the whole is embedded in each separate detail. Together, the works in the exhibition represent a collective pattern of movement, pointing back, forward and sideways.

’Generation loss’ might be interpreted as a generation of people who have lost something. Originally, it is a technical term denoting a cumulative loss of quality arising when copies of copies are made over time. Man’s genetic material is the result of replication, ensuring a stable passing-on of DNA from one generation to the next. Like the chromosomes in our cells, human culture has to be passed on. The DNA of our different cultures is structured by rituals, often appearing so heterogeneous in its form that it seems to surpass our own biology in complexity.[2] In light of the passing on of culture, ’generation loss’ might, on the contrary, evoke artistic value; each repetition serves to further inform the idiom. The minor deviations or displacements possibly resulting from repetition will form a basis for new experience. One is tempted to ask whether repetition exists, at all – or whether it is solely insistence on development?

“Body: it is a world-building word, filled with potential, and, as with glitch, filled with movement. Bodied, when used as a verb, is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as “giving material form to something abstract”.”[3]

/ Laura Goldschmidt

 

[1] Anne Fastrup: At vare – om tiden og bevidstheden hos Henri Bergson, 1989, pp. 19–20.

[2] Den Danske Radeerforening. Medlemsnyt, May 2020 by Andreas Albrectsen: ‘LA Air – Jonathan Monk’.

[3] Legacy Russell: Glitch Feminism. A Manifesto, (Glitch is Cosmic), 2020, pp. 41–42.


BETAMAX

Udstillingstitlen Betamax kommer fra Sonys 12,7 mm hjemmevideobåndformat, der blev lanceret i 1975. Navnet kommer af videobåndets løbeværk, der ligner det græske bogstav beta. På trods af flere fordele som fx bedre billedkvalitet blev det alligevel udkonkurreret af VHS-systemet på det globale marked. I dag tilhører VHS- og Betamax-formaterne en svunden tid, der for yngre generationer måske blot eksisterer som ord uden krop. Ord der er gledet ud af sproget og erstattet af nye standarder for digital repræsentation som JPEG eller NFT. Etymologisk set er ordet ’teknologi’ sammensat af téchnë, græsk for kunst og håndværk, og lógos, der betyder tanke og fornuft. Siden hen har teknologien i den grad bevæget sig væk fra sine oprindelige betydningsnuancer og påtaget sig en almægtig og til tider inhuman karakter.

”Det at bevidstheden hele tiden frembringer noget nyt, der er farvet af det, som det lige har været og straks skal blive, den evige forløben, selve fænomenet tilblivelsen af bevidsthedstilstande, dét er tiden. At være i tiden vil derfor sige at være tilblivende i en heterogen, kontinuerlig strøm af ’har været, er, vil blive’.”[1]

Kunstens væsen er nonlineær – ligesom vores tidsopfattelse. I udstillingen præsenteres syv forskellige praksisser, der sammenlagt strækker sig over fire generationer. Med deres individuelt funderede erfaringsgrundlag repræsenterer de forskellige aftryk i samtiden. Spor der krydser hinanden på tværs af medier. Det er et sammentræf, der, ligesom det nonrepræsentative maleri, aldrig er et resultat af tilfældigheder, men derimod af lagrede bevægelser og forståelsesmønstre, der opererer mellem flere bevidstheder.

Det er en psykologisk og fysisk algoritme, som benyttes til at skabe, undersøge og løse problemstillinger i skabelsesprocessen. På samme måde som i de kamerabaserede værker på udstillingen er det selve processen bag billedet, der udgør det endelige resultat. Vi præsenteres her for manipulerede overvågningsbilleder, som er blevet affotograferet fra skærmen som et analogt screenshot. Det er værker med et indbygget vakuum på 40 år – studier i tidlig digital billedeksperimentering, der dog ikke umiddelbart kan sættes ind i en specifik tidsramme, da værkernes tilblivelsesproces strækker sig over fire årtier.   

Ideen om et kontinuerligt udfoldelsesrum fortsættes i skulpturer, der fremstår både åbne, eksakte og uafsluttede i deres fortælling – et netværk, der samler flere rumligheder i én. Udstillingen former et sammensat netværk, hvori de større installationer dannes af objekter, som har gennemgået en fysisk kumulativ reduktion og redistribuering af energi – fra kolossale vertikale bindeled mellem himmel og jord til åbninger, der forener naturen med civilisationen. Flere af værkerne arbejder på individuel vis med foreningen af industrielt materiale og forskellige former for håndværk. Detaljen er ikke ophøjet, men er derimod essentiel for helheden – og helheden ligger samtidig i hver enkelt detalje. I fællesskab danner udstillingens værker et samlet bevægelsesmønster, der tidsmæssigt peger både bagud, fremad og sidelæns.

Et ’generationstab’ kan umiddelbart forstås som et udtryk for en årgang af mennesker, der har mistet noget. Oprindeligt er der dog tale om en teknisk betegnelse for en kumulativ forringelse af kvalitet, der opstår, når en kopi gentages over tid. Menneskets genetiske arvemateriale er resultatet af replikation, der på den måde sikrer dna’ets stabile videreførelse fra generation til generation. Ligesom kromosomerne i vores celler er menneskets kultur baseret på videreførelse. Vores forskellige kulturers dna er opbygget af ritualer og fremstår ofte så heterogen i sin form, at den synes at overgå̊ vores egen biologi i kompleksitet.[2] I lyset af kulturens videreførelse kan ’generationstabet’ tværtimod fremmane en kunstnerisk værdi; for ved hver gentagelse bliver formsproget mere informeret. Og de små afvigelser eller forskydninger, gentagelsen måtte medføre, danner grobund for ny erfaring. Man fristes til at spørge, om gentagelsen overhovedet findes – eller om der udelukkende er tale om insisteren på udvikling?

“Body: it is a world-building word, filled with potential, and, as with glitch, filled with movement. Bodied, when used as a verb, is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as ‘giving material form to something abstract’.”[3]

/ Laura Goldschmidt

 

[1] Anne Fastrup: At vare – om tiden og bevidstheden hos Henri Bergson, 1989, p. 19-20.

[2] Den Danske Radeerforening. Medlemsnyt, Maj 2020 ved Andreas Albrectsen: ”LA AIR – Jonathan Monk”.

[3] Legacy Russell: Glitch Feminism. A Manifesto, (Glitch is Cosmic), 2020, p. 41-42.

 

SUPERFLEX

SUPERFLEX
Like a Force of Nature
 
25.08.21-16.10.21
_
 
 
The exhibition Like a Force of Nature features two artworks that explore the almost ecstatic disorientation produced by the intricacy of the natural world and the dizzying economic systems that are rapidly altering that world in immeasurable ways. Today, when many rituals of surrender have been lost, surrendering to nature or economy can feel like a mystical experience, an encounter with the ungraspable.
 
Like a Force of Nature is a sculpture based on the Fibonacci sequence, which is a mathematical formula that appears in many kinds of natural growth, from sunflower seeds to tree branches to fish skin colorations. In around 300 BCE, Indian mathematicians first discovered this recurring sequence of numbers in Sanskrit poetry. It was later introduced to Western Europe by the Italian mathematician Fibonacci. Nearly psychedelic in its spiraling complexity, the formula functions as one of nature’s blueprints for expansion. The sculptures in Like a Force of Nature are lined with ceramic tiles in colors taken from global banknotes, arranged in patterns inspired by the sequence. These patterns look like they could be multiplied indefinitely, becoming infinitely more complex. Similarly, the swirling arrangement of the sculpture’s seven walls are based on the spiral of the golden ratio, which expands exponentially: if there were six more walls, the space between them would be the size of a football field, and if there were twenty more, there would be 100 kilometers between them. The expansive form of this spiral, along with the flickering order of the tiles, evokes the illusion that money is as natural as a volcano or tsunami, like a force of nature.
 
Investment Bank Flowerpots are models of the corporate headquarters of some of the world's largest investment banks, including Deutsche Bank, CitiGroup, and JPMorgan Chase. Each model serves as a flower pot for hallucinogenic plants. The euphoric effects of the plants are reminiscent of the effects of monetary transactions: the plants’ pharmaceutical capacity is determined by the wild math of nature, just as the global economy is shaped by the delirious power of the unbridled free market.
 
Like a Force of Nature was created in collaboration with Esrawe Studio and Rasmus Koch Studio.